[tahoe-dev] [tahoe-lafs] #630: explain debian compatibility: run-from-source vs run-from-.deb-package

tahoe-lafs trac at allmydata.org
Wed Feb 18 02:27:12 UTC 2009


#630: explain debian compatibility: run-from-source vs run-from-.deb-package
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  warner     |           Owner:  somebody 
     Type:  task       |          Status:  new      
 Priority:  major      |       Milestone:  undecided
Component:  packaging  |         Version:  1.3.0    
 Keywords:  debian     |   Launchpad_bug:           
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Changes (by zooko):

 * cc: tahoe-dev@… (added)


Comment:

 Thank you for writing this up!  This is a good plan.

 Now, as a matter of policy, which Debian/Ubuntu versions should we target
 to meet the second kind of "supported" -- the apt-get-centric kind?  I
 suggest Ubuntu Hardy, Ubuntu Intrepid, and Debian Lenny.  Zandr the
 allmydata.com Ops Guy says that he is happy requiring Ubuntu Hardy on
 things instead of having tahoe maintain apt-get-style compatibility with
 Ubuntu Gutsy, and also the Tahoe-1.3.0 release doesn't have the apt-get-
 centric kind of compatibility with Gutsy, since the Nevow installation on
 Gutsy doesn't have a .egg-info file, and Tahoe-1.3.0 generates a bin/tahoe
 executable using setuptools.  (This may not have been entirely intended --
 I didn't mean to make the bin/tahoe executable which worked on Gutsy in
 Tahoe-1.2.0 stop working in Tahoe-1.3.0.  Once we have the automated
 testing described in this ticket then such unexpected changes will be less
 common.)

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/ticket/630#comment:1>
tahoe-lafs <http://allmydata.org>
secure decentralized file storage grid


More information about the tahoe-dev mailing list