[tahoe-dev] [tahoe-lafs] #778: "shares of happiness" is the wrong measure; "servers of happiness" is better
tahoe-lafs
trac at allmydata.org
Tue Sep 22 17:47:07 UTC 2009
#778: "shares of happiness" is the wrong measure; "servers of happiness" is
better
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: zooko | Owner: kevan
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: 1.5.1
Component: code-peerselection | Version: 1.4.1
Keywords: reliability | Launchpad_bug:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Changes (by zooko):
* owner: warner => kevan
Comment:
Brian doesn't know the answer to this off the top of his head, either.
Help! Assigning this ticket to "nobody".
Oh wait, maybe repairer *doesn't* need to know servers of happiness.
Maybe we should set it to 0. Repair is currently intended to finish
regardless of how well it is doing and then report to the user how well it
did, so then it should just report the resulting servers of happiness when
it is done. That would, I ''think'' be analogous to the way the current
repairer works with regard to shares of happiness (which by the way I
wrote). Kevan: does that make any sense?
Assigning this ticket to Kevan.
--
Ticket URL: <http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/ticket/778#comment:48>
tahoe-lafs <http://allmydata.org>
secure decentralized file storage grid
More information about the tahoe-dev
mailing list