[tahoe-dev] Behavior when storage nodes go below shares.happy?

Zooko O'Whielacronx zooko at zooko.com
Sat Jul 10 17:33:37 UTC 2010

> We had spoken about migrating the tahoe.cfg semantics from shares.happy
> to servers.happy... and I think that's a good thing (in time for 1.7.1?).


http://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/ticket/1092# shares.happy is the
wrong name of the measure

There's still time to get this in for 1.7.1! But I'm not prioritizing
it myself, so it needs someone else.



More information about the tahoe-dev mailing list