[tahoe-dev] go ahead and package Tahoe-LAFS
fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar
Thu Oct 21 15:46:13 UTC 2010
El 21/10/10 08:33, Zooko O'Whielacronx dijo:
> following-up to my own post:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Zooko O'Whielacronx <zooko at zooko.com> wrote:
> > 4. If you are a packager who integrates open source software into
> > operating systems like Debian, Fedora, the NetBSD ports collection,
> > NixOS, etc., then do *not* let the noise and excitement deter you from
> > packaging Tahoe-LAFS. Tahoe-LAFS is perfectly packageable today (it is
> > included in Ubuntu for example), and there is no reason to make your
> > users wait for the dust to settle. We will help.
> Oh, Ubuntu is not the only example. Here is a matrix showing which
> operating systems/packaging systems already have Tahoe-LAFS:
> Ubuntu has Tahoe-LAFS v1.7.1, nixpkgs has Tahoe-LAFS v1.7.1, FreeBSD
> has Tahoe-LAFS v1.7.1, and pkgsrc (e.g. NetBSD) has Tahoe-LAFS v1.8.0.
> I would love for this table to get more rows (new operating
> systems/packaging systems) and I would love for the column showing
> which version of Tahoe-LAFS to change to "v1.8.1" everywhere. :-)
Hi, is there a packaging guide? Tahoe-LAFS is on Arch's AUR, but is
outdated (v1.7.1). I'm trying to run `python2 setup.py --requires` but it doesn't show anything!
xmpp:fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar
gnu/linux user #455044
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the tahoe-dev