[tahoe-dev] Design review keywords

[David-Sarah Hopwood]

On 2011-01-08 22:50, tahoe-lafs wrote:
> #993: refactor download interfaces to treat immutable files and mutable versions
> more uniformly
> 
> Comment (by kevan):
> 
>  An implementation of this ticket (including the interface) is in #393, so
>  I don't think there's anything to apply here. I'll remove review-needed.
>  I'm tempted to say that #993 could be marked as a duplicate of #393, but
>  it might be useful to be able to discuss the interface independently of
>  #393 as a whole, which is fairly long and involves other issues.
> 
>  (Maybe we should make a trac keyword that says that a ticket is in
>  particular need of design feedback or review but doesn't involve any code
>  changes. Then 'review-needed' could be used only for code changes needing
>  a review before they can be committed, and the other keyword could be used
>  for tickets like #993, which don't have a patch that we'd want to apply
>  but could benefit from other perspectives.)

I suggest 'design-review-needed', and 'design-reviewed' when done.

(This will be included in the existing review-needed query on the ViewTickets
page, because keyword queries match substrings.)

-- 
David-Sarah Hopwood  ⚥  http://davidsarah.livejournal.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 292 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/attachments/20110109/15dba9ac/attachment.asc>