[tahoe-dev] https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/FAQ Q25

Vikarti Anatra vikarti at viorsan.com
Fri Feb 10 05:56:19 UTC 2012


Hi,
Any ideas how to proceed with this survey?
just here in mailing list?
10.02.2012, в 2:21, Jimmy Tang написал(а):

> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Vikarti Anatra <vikarti at viorsan.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Per small IRC discussion, my mailing list research,etc
>> I put(per zooko's advice) new FAQ entry in https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/wiki/FAQ (Q24) about proper setting for k,h,N for small private grid setup
>> Please pitch in if you have more ideas.
> 
> 
> I've been thinking about this a bit, one would need to define 'small'.
> My personal definition of a small grid of tahoe nodes would be 4
> nodes, and in a case like that 3-of-4 wouldn't sound too crazy at
> first, then I realised that doing 2-of-4 made more sense for me. At
> 2-of-4 I'm no worse off than a replicated GPFS/GlusterFS setup across
> 4 machines. It just means that I need to be more rigorous with
> repairing and monitoring my small system.
> 
> Perhaps it might be interesting and useful to find out (by doing a
> small survey) to see what sort of sized grids are out there?
> 
> Jimmy.
> 
> -- 
> http://www.sgenomics.org/~jtang/
> _______________________________________________
> tahoe-dev mailing list
> tahoe-dev at tahoe-lafs.org
> http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev




More information about the tahoe-dev mailing list