does Tahoe play well with ceph?
eugen at leitl.org
Mon Mar 24 12:53:55 UTC 2014
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:49:29PM +0200, Oleksandr Drach wrote:
> Hello Eugen!
> Really strange question.
> Why do you need to put Tahoe on top of Ceph? Are such overheads acceptable
> at all?
I think about ceph as building high-performance high-availability
expandable storage from unreliable components on a (ultra)local, fast,
Tahoe would be a higher level service which can use above storage backend
over a number of WAN links.
More information about the tahoe-dev